Skip to main content
Request a demoFor you
NorskEnglish
Menu

Appearance

Study summary

Readiness and autoregulation during in-season back squats

Vegard Ege BjellandUniversity of Stavanger2024
  • Velocity-based training
  • Sport performance

In brief

Across 15 weeks, this thesis examined whether readiness measures predicted squat volume under 20% and 30% velocity-loss thresholds. Associations were small and depended on the threshold. The author proposed combining subjective readiness, lifting velocity and occasional countermovement jumps rather than relying on a single readiness measure.

What was studied

Data from 38 young elite ice hockey players included subjective readiness, jumps, reactive strength, isometric strength, mean propulsive velocity and back-squat volume across a 15-week in-season period.

What the source reported

  1. 01

    Subjective readiness, countermovement jump and mean propulsive velocity had small correlations with repetition volume in 30% velocity-loss sessions.

  2. 02

    Only mean propulsive velocity correlated significantly with volume in 20% velocity-loss sessions.

  3. 03

    Changes in readiness aligned more often with autoregulation at the 30% threshold than at the 20% threshold.

How to interpret the findings

The findings describe associations in young elite ice hockey players during one in-season period. They do not establish a universal readiness score or a causal rule for changing training.

Source details

Exploring the Relationship Between Readiness and Autoregulation in Barbell Back Squats Performed with Velocity Loss-Thresholds: An In-Season Intervention Study with Elite Junior Ice Hockey Players
Author(s)
Vegard Ege Bjelland
Institution
University of Stavanger
Year
2024
Document type
Master's thesis
Length
102 pages
Source language
English
Read the original study (PDF)

The PDF is provided from the source file linked to this record.

This is Alphatek's editorial summary of the linked source. It is not a new peer-reviewed publication or an individual diagnostic recommendation.

Put the evidence in context

See how the platform fits the people, workflow and decisions in your organisation.

Request a demo

Have a question? Email us